CultBag

avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
avatar
Osprey Packs Backpack
$103
Remove
Subtotal
$103

  • October 4, 2021
  • 266
  • 1180 Views 0

Face Painters | An Interview With Giovanni Sanseviero

INTERVIEWS
Cult Critic Face Painters | An Interview With Giovanni Sanseviero

Interviewed by Barry John Terblanche :

Face Painters is a dual-narrative, multicultural epic set primarily in two eras in the lives of the Gravetti family. Told through the eyes of Buono Gravetti, the present time is 1963. Then, serving as an epilogue to Buono’s ninety-nine-year journey on earth, our time with him will conclude in 2022. The past narrative is 1928, a retelling of Buono’s recollection, as a six-year-old, weeks before immigrating to the United States.

Cult Critic – Your name, it’s Italian; your story pivots around the Italian–American immigration. Is Face Painters based on your past family history?

Giovanni - Not so much on the nose, but the “emigration” aspect of Face Painters was part of my family’s evolution to the United States. I guess, like anyone permanently leaving their homeland for a better life elsewhere, my parents were already being bombarded with the scary thoughts of not knowing what to expect, and then the actual hard realities of many times being treated like shit, for lack of a better word, the second-class “shackles” the locals would put on them. The funny thing was, from some of the stories my parents told me, many of the people that did treat them unfairly, were their own kind, fellow Italians: “The ones that got here before us and could barely piece together an English sentence, suddenly, they were so superior to us.” I don’t know. Maybe beating up on your own kind is easier, more cowardly for sure, like a mafia mindset taking advantage of their own kind. Or maybe these superior idiots simply didn’t like being reminded of just how much they were once treated like second class citizens themselves. Face Painters touches on many examples of being treated unfairly, and by all inequities, not just racism: from within one’s own ethnicity (the former narrative, 1928 Tuscany) to the civil unrest perpetrated against African Americans (the latter narrative, 1963 Brooklyn) Even the protagonist’s brother will spew venomous words towards his own family, and you should see what a “pillar of community” he is not.

Cult Critic – Have you envisioned any film actors to portray the colorful characters in Face Painter yet?

Giovanni - Mark Ruffalo (twice suggested to me) to play Buono, the elder, illiterate son (1963), and the character Face Painters completely revolves around (no idea who would portray Buono as a child, but think loveable Toto from Cinema Paradiso); Bobby Cannavale to play Luca, the overreaching father (1928) and failing elder (1963), the deuteragonist in our story and, no lie, suggested to me on four different, unsolicited, occasions; Vincent Piazza to play Michael, the younger turbulent brother (1963); Stanley Tucci to take on Leo, the hard- nosed patriarch (1928); Benicio Del Toro to cameo Garibaldi, a poetic shipping mogul (1928); Mark Margolis to play Fatman Providenza, a callous local strongarm (1928); Marion Cotillard to play Isabella, Buono’s loving and unwavering mother (1928); Shiri Appleby to portray Abbey, Buono’s love-torn companion (1963). Not sure who would portray feisty Scarlett, her tomboy daughter, but think Scout from To Kill a Mockingbird; John Amos to play Freddie, a downtrodden father (1963); Jon Hamm to play Elias, a suave Wall Street investor (1963); Juliette Lewis to play drunkard Molly, Michael’s “Teddy Girl” squeeze (1963), and Bill Camp to take on Bishop Pio, a trickster cleric (1928). As for directing, a few names obviously come to mind, and an actor’s director would be paramount. I don’t know why, but over the past few years, and as unusual as Daniel Day-Lewis may seem for a film director’s choice, I keep thinking...why not? What he represents as a disciple and practitioner of cinematic storytelling, in general, tops my list as a person possessing the consummate sensibilities for a sweeping epic like Face Painters.

Cult Critic – Would you want to be a part of the filming... film director or film producer? And what emphasis would you concentrate on the most to best bring out your story?

Giovanni - Well, it’s not like I would even have a choice. This is a big-budget project that will require some heavy hitters— from directing to talent to film investors, so an opportunity like you’re suggesting isn’t even plausible; essentially, I have completed my job. However, what I can continue to offer, invaluably, is my insight to the film characters, their mindset, and the overarching psychology of Face Painters. Mind you, not that anyone would even care for this input, but this is a heavily-concentrated character study above all else, and the utmost care should to be secured in preserving this specific quality. And when money, and budgeting, and all the logistical damnations to a production start conflicting (nothing new here), if preserving this very personal quality is emphasized most, as you asked, Face Painters will succeed as a timeless testament to cinematic storytelling...I’ll bet my life on it.

Cult Critic – Why the title; Face Painters?

Giovanni - In the former narrative of 1928 Italy, our hero, Buono, reminisces about his childhood before journeying to America, and a great deal of this has to do with his father, Luca, and his ambitions to one day be an American style funeral director. When Luca blindly attempts such a funeral in a little agrarian town—complete with never-before-seen makeshift makeup, fancy casket, and a chapel filled with meaningless pomp, the peasants show their disdain by calling him a face painter. Subsequently, when Buono follows in his father’s footsteps in the latter narrative of 1963 Brooklyn, the epithet lives on, but now in its plural form.

Cult Critic – What would you like the film audience to take away from the story/movie.

Giovanni - Forever knowing Buono at a very personal level and as if he was always a friend of theirs. And even if they didn’t know him, that he still somehow knew them; through his own hardships and what he had to endure, his understanding of their hard times through his willingness to not give up on himself. Maybe in the end, the film audience somehow realizing that they always did know Buono through the mutual understanding of the gift of life, and to not give up on it. I guess a cathartic experience is what I’m laboring to say.

Cult Critic – Your writing to your voice is very strong on drama. Is drama your forte? What other film genres interest you, and why?

Giovanni - I’m a sucker for drama; my parents were opera singers, and growing up for my siblings and me was like being in one big outlandish opera. Even when my father yelled at me—I was a real ballbreaker—he took on this high C quality that really had a pleasant ring to it. But let me tell you, when things did get bad, there was no shortage of front-row drama. But what I enjoy writing most are the dark comedy films, that thin line between humor and tragedy that can really be screwed around with. I have something brewing along this demented line.

Cult Critic – For a 197-page script, how long did it take to write, and how many drafts?

Giovanni - At least fifteen years of stop and go. Many times, I simply put the script down and walked away for months because I didn’t know what the story was about—sounds strange not to know that, but sometimes you suddenly find yourself frighteningly deserted on some island after confidently thinking you knew everything. And then, there you are, Gilligan, sucking on a coconut. Scary feeling to be there after investing so much time. As for drafts, I’d say two dozen mostly dealt with formatting; working the dialogue’s appropriate slang, idioms and the references that could be made during the two different (period) eras; and cleaning up the action paragraphs—the grammar of it all I’m a complete mess with. But I did stick with it. On a heavier scale, I’d say at least three dozen more drafts interspersed that panned out to be major overhauls, like the overall plots and toying with the many threads, placing exposition; rebuilding the protagonist and his troublesome brother; who would live, who died, and so on. But a real tricky thing was toying with a double narrative; it really messed with the logistics of scenes and their timelines—especially with the main characters being depicted at two different stages in their lives. It was a juggling act to say the least, and with continuity always being paramount.

Cult Critic – What were the biggest challenges you faced in writing this film script?

Giovanni - Simply sitting down and writing at a consistent level. This is a problem with anything I try to write, although other than complete meltdowns, I did stay with the script in one form or another: film editing, writing backstories, picking characters and arbitrarily starting fights between them, even writing scenes that didn’t apply to the story—let’s see what they’re capable of saying or doing, then finding their boundaries and how they might treat each other. Just peeling apart the layers of the characters really opened things up for me, discovering them more and more. Then the dialogue and the mannerisms became first nature to the individuals—to the individuals, not me. Many, many times, it was more like taking dictation and not at all writing dialogue. Later on, the biggest challenge was not being intimidated by the size of the story, especially a sweeping double narrative that I never tried before. And for sure, the stories had to be unique but still ring familiar to each other.

  Cult Critic – Most screenwriters would not venture 197 pages. They’d shy at 140+. To this, what advice would you give aspiring screenwriters?

Giovanni - I’m not sure. Maybe sticking to an industry standard page count would be wiser at first. Get a couple of those under your belt, and then work your way up to a more complex saga if that’s in fact what you want to write. But I’m a little nervous about applying rules to storytelling. Just write the story and don’t meander, keep it sharp. And what actually is an industry standard? Coppola made a dynasty out of three-hour-plus screenplays, so I would have loved to watch some jaded hack tell him what the film industry standard should have been. You know what the film industry standard should be? Write a terrific story, then the page count can be dealt with afterwards. After all, would the page count even matter if the story didn’t?

Cult Critic – You have put great effort into marketing your film script, rightfully so. It even has its own dedicated website. What is your advice on marketing one's script?

Giovanni - I really can’t answer this without repeating the same things we’ve already heard over and over: from finding representation to your work achieving some notoriety on those screenplay platforms, ultimately, the more the better, I think. And research the rep. for the best pairing up. Blind queries and that “one size fits all” gameplan won’t be efficient; at least it never was for me. Two things for sure and in this exact order: #1: if you’re on the cusp of marketing, you better make damn sure your work is unimpeachable. Don’t bullshit yourself because a second chance is the only thing even more remote than a first chance. You can’t give that first chance away. Stay home, forget your friends, whatever you have to do to hammer out the best work you can. Then market to the appropriate people which will have a higher ROI (Return On Investment). And #2: don’t ever rely on anyone else to do your work—certainly not at this point. Got yourself a manager, an agent? Great. Now start looking for the leads yourself and work together with them. I assure you, you won’t be their number one concern; you on the other hand, by default, are already your most important client.

Cult Critic – What drove you to become a screenwriter?

Giovanni - My lack of success as a film actor...but all kidding aside...my lack of success as an actor.

Cult Critic – What's next for you... are you working on a new film script?

Giovanni - I’m trying to get back to a dark comedy film themed around mutual betrayal between two charlatans and the greedy players around them. It’s really out there as for the story’s reality which experiments with just how thinly apart sound reasoning is from outright absurdity...maybe all-in-all, this reality’s not so far out there by the looks of things that are happening around us. It’s got the Coen Brothers, John Malkovich, and John Ruffalo written all over it. As for right now, I have to keep pushing Face Painters the most. The film festival circuit alone has been quite an undertaking for some time now, with just about 160 competition entries to date and pushing sixty awards. Plus, all the website updating, artwork, spread sheets, social media, interviews and so on. This is all necessary for the next step which is to hopefully get the script to the film actors I have in mind; this is something I have to try, especially with a screenplay that is so adverse to the three-act beat sheet. If I’m lucky enough to gain their interest, I believe their influence will go a long way to help navigate that proverbial long road ahead of me. I’m confident the festival accomplishments will speak well on my behalf—at best, a pleasant icebreaker it should prove. Frankly, for the moment it’s really all I have to work with, so ever up and onward! Thank you, kindly, Barry John Terblanche. Great questions, and I really appreciated it. With respect, a hat tip. Gio

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *